There are 2 messages totalling 95 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. fevered brows (was--Re: anybody looking for roomies for the Highlander Reunion Con?) 2. fevered brows (was--Re: anybody looking for roomies for theHighlander Reunion Con?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:44:24 -1000 From: Geiger <geiger@maui.net> Subject: Re: fevered brows (was--Re: anybody looking for roomies for the Highlander Reunion Con?) Wendy's back, Wendy's back, Wendy's back!!!-- > Oh yeah..Joe annoyed me too. Well, 2-faced lying/cheating/sneaks have that effect on me, too. >>>And..when you think about it..do they really think *anyone* is going to care that Immortals lived..once the Immortals are dead?>>> Yes--just what ARE they saving it all for? A REALLY good book deal? >>>I think people will be angry that the Watchers knew about these neat guys and kept it all a secret.>>> I think some Watchers someplace are on the take, in some sense, from some Immies. (Is that clear?) Or, maybe the head honcho Watchers have always been Immies, & the whole thing is part of how they play The Game, staying alive w/ insider info... Could well be Methos' master plan ... except master plans take so much energy & tend to cut into one's beer time. I do understand the theory behind the Watchers--to observe & record, yada, yada, yada, for posterity. But, whatever the benefits there, I've never gotten just who decided that possible (& rather amorphous) future benefit was MORE important to humanity than current knowledge of the truth about Immies--or what the rationale was. >>> No..no...save your money. (I did finally break down and buy a katana.)(I guess some obsessions die harder than others)(Now I want a swept-hilt rapier.)>>> I refuse to admit what I've been buying (or selling!), on the grounds I've made a fool of myself quite enough already of late. >>>I have a weaseling to pack off to Europe before I can settle down in front of the twin VCR's and subject my brain to the Paris episodes .>>> That last part sounds so very painful--self-medicate as needed. >>> You can say that again. If we couldn't have great plots and superior acting...we could have at least had steamy sex scenes.>>> They may as well have set the silly show in a nunnery.... >>> #mean-spirited(And I still want one tiny reference to Duncan in 22 hours.)(I know...I know..they didn't want to confuse anyone.)(I know ..I know..you can't just drop lines into scripts willy-nilly.)(I still want it.)(Watching Nick walk along the Seine, past the barge's old mooring was painful.)(One damn flashback could have been about Duncan.)(They used enough HL:TS clips as it was.)(Am I ranting?)(Still ranting after all these years.)(Did someone say "get a life"?)(Oh, shut up over there!)>>> Oh, Wendy--you make my heart glad! Nina geiger@maui.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:49:34 -0400 From: KLZ <zklee@patriot.net> Subject: Re: fevered brows (was--Re: anybody looking for roomies for theHighlander Reunion Con?) > (Watching Nick walk along the Seine, past the barge's old mooring was painful.)(One damn > flashback could have been about Duncan.)(They used enough HL:TS clips as it was.)(Am I > ranting?)(Still ranting after all these years.)(Did someone say "get a life"?)(Oh, shut up over there!) Yeah, I know what you mean. I recently bought Stargate SG-1 season 1 eps. Cold Lazarus: "Hey! That's where Duncan and Grayson fought! But I don't remember any blue crystals..." (and then wondering if the Q blasted the crystals, not staff weapons) Singularity: "Hey! That's where Duncan and Killian had the two-level fight, ahd Duncan whacked him!" There were other moments, of course, but those two stuck out in my mind, probably because there were spectacular Q's involved. Plus, Duplicate Jack had kind of a Q in Cold Lazarus. ~grumpy (I need a life too) ------------------------------ End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 19 Jun 2001 to 20 Jun 2001 (#2001-170) ***************************************************************