HIGHLA-L Digest - 26 Feb 2001 to 27 Feb 2001 (#2001-83)
Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@LISTS.PSU.EDU)
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:00:01 -0500
There are 13 messages totalling 397 lines in this issue.
Topics of the day:
1. Endgame- Spoilers- Upon rewatching (4)
2. Question about Raven (2)
3. Need info on First Wave (6)
4. Second DVD version of Endgame
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 22:49:47 -0500
From: jjswbt@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Endgame- Spoilers- Upon rewatching
Spoilers
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
I said:
>19)What was up with the Watcher trying to kill Duncan? If he was so afraid of Kell winning..wouldn't killing *Kell* make more sense?
Mary says:
>OK Number 19
>
>Matthew Need two Immortals he was going to shoot both of them and keep them
>in a different sanctuary.
Not exactly. He explains that so long as there are at least 2 Immortal and they are kept apart, the Prize is safe. He never specified that Duncan and Kell were to be those 2 , nor did he say he was going to shoot anyone. Even if that was his plan, shooting Duncan (from a distance) while Kell was on the spot wielding a sword, would have almost guaranteed that Duncan ended up beheaded. By the time the Watcher crossed the street to pick up Duncan, either Duncan would have reanimated or Kell would have killed Duncan. A lose-lose situation.
In any event..shooting *Kell* is always the better plan because either the Watcher lock him up...or Duncan kills him A win-win situation
Wendy(I always thought the Watchers were dumb and dangerous..this proves it.)
Fairy Killer
jjswbt@earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~jjswbt/index.html
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 22:51:01 EST
From: Highlandmg@aol.com
Subject: Re: Endgame- Spoilers- Upon rewatching
Sorry Wendy
What I meant was he would shoot both Duncan and Kell. And then get both of
the immortals.
Mary
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 22:55:12 -0500
From: Carrie Key <reeana1@home.com>
Subject: Re: Endgame- Spoilers- Upon rewatching
----- Original Message -----
From: <jjswbt@EARTHLINK.NET>
To: <HIGHLA-L@LISTS.PSU.EDU>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [HL] Endgame- Spoilers- Upon rewatching
> Spoilers
> 1
> 2
>
> 4
> 5
> 6
> 7
> 8
> 9
> 0
> 1
> 2
> 3
> 4
> 5
> 6
> 7
> 8
> 9
> I said:
> >19)What was up with the Watcher trying to kill Duncan? If he was so
afraid of Kell winning..wouldn't killing *Kell* make more sense?
>
> Mary says:
> >OK Number 19
> >
> >Matthew Need two Immortals he was going to shoot both of them and keep
them
> >in a different sanctuary.
>
> Not exactly. He explains that so long as there are at least 2 Immortal and
they are kept apart, the Prize is safe. He never specified that Duncan and
Kell were to be those 2 , nor did he say he was going to shoot anyone. Even
if that was his plan, shooting Duncan (from a distance) while Kell was on
the spot wielding a sword, would have almost guaranteed that Duncan ended up
beheaded. By the time the Watcher crossed the street to pick up Duncan,
either Duncan would have reanimated or Kell would have killed Duncan. A
lose-lose situation.
>
> In any event..shooting *Kell* is always the better plan because either the
Watcher lock him up...or Duncan kills him A win-win situation
>
> Wendy(I always thought the Watchers were dumb and dangerous..this proves
it.)
Hmmm? I always though that he was trying to shoot Kell to make sure that he
didn't win. Maybe I should watch it again just to be sure:). Oh darn! I
think Joe showed up cuz of all the e bull and flack he had gotten for
'trashing' his oath and was no way in hell going to allow someone else to do
that. Yes, it also had to do with Mac, but come on. How often had Joe gotten
the "oath" thrown into his face for every little 'minor' transgression? Her
was this watcher really messing with the game when he wasn't suppose to. I
doubt that Joe would let the guy get away with that, protecting Mac or not.
Just my .02.
---
Carrie Key
** reeana1@home.com **
** http://www.angelfire.com/me2/reeana **
** http://members.home.net/olwasasdc/OLWASA.htm **
Lady Reeana, Ana Vatazes, Javina Jinn,
PWFC, Jedi Council
Clan of the Eternally Clueless
"Tas,You doorknob!"- Flint Fireforge,DragonLance
"Dogs believe they are human. Cats believe they are God." - Unknown
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 21:53:38 -0800
From: Jen <data@cyberg8t.com>
Subject: Question about Raven
Quick question...does the name of Liam's church ever pop up in the
episode? I need to know for a little fanfic I'm writing. :) Any help
is much appreciated. :)
Thanks!!
Jen
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 21:57:14 -0800
From: Jen <data@cyberg8t.com>
Subject: Re: Question about Raven
Erg! *L* Show, not episode. *thwaps typo*
Jen
Jen wrote:
>
> Quick question...does the name of Liam's church ever pop up in the
> episode? I need to know for a little fanfic I'm writing. :) Any help
> is much appreciated. :)
>
> Thanks!!
>
> Jen
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:31:14 -1000
From: Pat Bentley <patb@hawaii.rr.com>
Subject: Need info on First Wave
Hi there,
Anybody know the name of the ep PW will be in for First Wave, and when it
will air?
Patter
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:46:57 +0200
From: Tarryn Zank <Zankt@nu.ac.za>
Subject: Re: Need info on First Wave
It's called 'Shadowland' and has both PW and JB in it! Though I don't remember if they are ever in a scene together. i don't know about US screening, someone else will have to help you with that, but we've already had it down here in SOuth Africa. Now that's something amazing, we got a series before the US! Usually it takes 3 years minimum before we see something.
Tarryn
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 08:00:59 -0000
From: Jette Goldie <jette@blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Need info on First Wave
> It's called 'Shadowland' and has both PW and JB in it! Though I don't
remember if they are ever in a scene together. i don't know about US
screening, someone else will have to help you with that, but we've already
had it down here in SOuth Africa. Now that's something amazing, we got a
series before the US! Usually it takes 3 years minimum before we see
something.
>
This would be which season of First Wave?
Jette
Glory may be fleeting, but obscurity is forever!
bosslady@scotlandmail.com
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/fanfic.html
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:09:50 +0200
From: Tarryn Zank <Zankt@nu.ac.za>
Subject: Re: Need info on First Wave
Someone asked which season of First Wave PW is in. The ep he's in is 'Shadowland' and it's #13 of season 3. I get all my episode guides from this site, which is very comprehensive (when it comes to US shows): http://epguides.com/
Tarryn.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:35:42 -0500
From: swrdlvr@webtv.net
Subject: Re: Need info on First Wave
Thanks for the info on FW and for that wonderful episode site.It's
really terrific.I've watched First Wave since 1st season and am excited
about PW and JB appearing.
Kelly
Someone asked which season of First Wave PW is in. The ep he's in is
'Shadowland' and it's #13 of season 3. I get all my episode guides from
this site, which is very comprehensive (when it comes to US shows):
http://epguides.com/
Tarryn.
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 07:47:57 -0800
From: Lynn <lloschin@sprynet.com>
Subject: Re: Need info on First Wave
First Wave in the US has shown about 7 episodes of season 3 so
far. I imagine it will go into rerun hell or hiatus for awhile before it
gets up to Episode 13.
(Cool articles about FW in the current issue of Dreamwatch.)
On 27 Feb 01, at 7:35, swrdlvr@WEBTV.NET wrote:
> Thanks for the info on FW and for that wonderful episode site.It's
> really terrific.I've watched First Wave since 1st season and am excited
> about PW and JB appearing.
>
> Kelly
>
> Someone asked which season of First Wave PW is in. The ep he's in is
> 'Shadowland' and it's #13 of season 3. I get all my episode guides from
> this site, which is very comprehensive (when it comes to US shows):
> http://epguides.com/
> Tarryn.
Lynn Loschin
Mailto: lloschin@sprynet.com
Web: http://home.sprynet.com/~lloschin
ICQ#: 308138
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:53:24 -0500
From: jjswbt@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Endgame- Spoilers- Upon rewatching
Hey! Remember the spoiler spaces guys!
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mary said:
>What I meant was he would shoot both Duncan and Kell. And then get both of
>the immortals.
My objection still holds. The Watcher was across the street and up several flights. He shoots Duncan. Kell is no where in sight. If the Watcher waits for Kell to come into view, he risks either Duncan waking up or Kell managing to behead Duncan before he too is shot. What are the odds he could get both Immortals in the same "frame" *and* shoot them both *and* get across the street to tie them up before one or the other woke up?
It simply makes no sense...*unless* the scene was intended to be earlier in the film (somehow) when the Watchers might have been trying to recapture Duncan *before* he faced Kell. Doing it *during* the fight is stupid.
Wendy(Not that the Watchers have any trouble being stupid.)
Fairy Killer
jjswbt@earthlink.net
http://home.earthlink.net/~jjswbt/index.html
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:16:00 -0500
From: Dianne Trautmann <diannet@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Second DVD version of Endgame
I have a question about something in the unfinished version of Endgame,
found on the second disc of the DVD:
spoiler spaces......
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Could someone explain to me the significance of Connor (and later Duncan in
honor of Connor's memory) depositing the Christmas tree at the church - said
to have been done every year since 1977?
Thanks.
Dianne Trautmann
diannet@ix.netcom.com
------------------------------
End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 26 Feb 2001 to 27 Feb 2001 (#2001-83)
**************************************************************