There is 1 message totalling 36 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. Tolerance. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:24:12 -0500 From: kageorge <kageorge1@verizon.net> Subject: Re: Tolerance. tarsh wrote: > > What I've never understood is why Duncan killed Ingrid (the one > bombing neo-Nazi meetings in reparation for failing to kill Hitler way > back when). He didn't kill Kristin, he didn't kill Annie Devlin... he > killed Ingrid. Why was she different? They were all old lovers, they > were all killing people in greater or lesser numbers for reasons of > their own... he only kills one of them. There's no consistency I can see. I disagree here. There is consistency, although it's subtle. Ingrid was an *immediate* threat to the lives of dozens of mortals, and stated her plan to continue her campaign of assassination. The 'proof' that Kristin had killed Louise 300-odd years before was circumstantial, she *hadn't* succeeded in killing what's-her-name and wasn't an immediate threat to anyone. Recall that, at Richie's behest, he also spared the punk-rocker-gal who had killed mortals in the past, but not anyone in the present. Annie Devlin also hadn't succeeded in killing anyone in the present and wasn't an immediate threat to any mortal. There's not One Simple Rule, but as a general proposition, he will try to avoid killing an Immortal (especially a female Immortal - I think they are not that common) he has a relationship with unless they present an immediate threat to mortals. MacG ------------------------------ End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 9 Feb 2006 to 10 Feb 2006 (#2006-37) *************************************************************