HIGHLA-L Digest - 30 Oct 2004 to 1 Nov 2004 (#2004-200)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@lists.psu.edu)
      Mon, 1 Nov 2004 22:00:04 -0500

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 1 Nov 2004 to 5 Nov 2004 (#2004-201)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 29 Oct 2004 to 30 Oct 2004 (#2004-199)"

      --------
      There are 5 messages totalling 610 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. Season Five DVDs:  Comes a Horseman (pt 1/2)
        2. Season Five DVDs:  Comes A Horseman (pt 2/2)
        3. 'Best Of' Really? (3)
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:26:13 -0500
      From:    kageorge <kageorge@erols.com>
      Subject: Season Five DVDs:  Comes a Horseman (pt 1/2)
      
      This one is broken into two parts because of length. The entire
      commentary, with screen captures, is at:
      http://www.wordsmiths.net/MacGeorge/episodes/Season5/CAH.htm
      
      COMMENTARY: David A. tells us that CAH was “the quintessential
      Highlander episode.” Great locations, great sex, incredible villains,
      wonderful drama, great surprises. Putting CAH and Rev. 6 together and
      spending $20 million dollars on it would have made an incredible feature
      film. David says he doesn’t remember who had the original idea, but that
      the best story discussions were where no one was “keeping score,” and
      there was a free flow of ideas. The general idea was, what if the Four
      Horsemen of the Apocalypse were four evil Immortals who “cut a swatch
      through Arabia and the entire world”? We know that Methos is 5,000 years
      old, and it made sense – especially since the Methos we know now is not
      a saint – that he would be evil for some portion of his life. David said
      Peter Wingfield was the perfect guy to play it because not only did he
      have the strength to play the villain, he also had the ability to shrug
      his shoulders and say, “shit happens” and move on. David was
      particularly fond of the jimmy scene where MacLeod is up against the
      car, unwilling or unable to believe that Methos had done such evil in
      his past, and Methos turns on him, saying yes, he did it because he
      *liked* it.
      
      Valentine Pelka comments that he doesn’t understand why, despite
      budgetary differences and time constraints, television drama cannot be
      shot like a film. He says that was what the 99th and 100th episodes of
      Highlander were shot as and, “were fantastic.” He tells us that if he
      were defined by the roles he played, including Kronos, he would be a
      really twisted individual, so “thank God, hopefully, I’m not that.” Val
      opines that he didn’t really see Kronos as strictly a stock bad guy.
      Kronos was put on earth to fulfill a certain function, and one of the
      most liberating things about playing the character, in comparison with
      playing someone like Hamlet, who is a man with scruples, was to play
      someone without scruples. There are no constraints, and there was an
      enjoyable liberation about playing Kronos, “coupled with the fact that
      the four of us got on like a house on fire.” He says the only thing
      Kronos truly needs is Methos, and the scene where he greets and stabs
      Methos to death is an apocalyptic/Immortal version of saying,
      “Surprise!” and punching him in the stomach.
      
      Peter W. says the whole idea was “fantastic” and a reflection on the
      strength of the Methos character for people to be able to look at the
      character and say, “Oh, my goodness, it’s possible.” It was exciting to
      do, and the script was terrific, with many great scenes. Playing Methos
      was, for Peter, like going to drama school because the challenges were
      always different. In a practical sense, the swordfights were a
      challenge, and in the Horsemen episode, he had to get on a horse, and
      Peter couldn’t ride. Then there were emotional challenges, where he
      encountered a huge range of vulnerable places: falling in love, great
      grief, then to show the anger, the rage and violence demanded an
      enormous stretch for him as an actor. In the meeting where he and
      Cassandra first see each other, and that, “Okay, I’m in *big* trouble,
      here,” moment, Peter wasn’t sure how in control Methos was from the
      moment he sees Cassandra, and from the moment that Kronos appears in his
      life, rekindling all those parts in Methos that loved that life (and
      Kronos knows it).
      
      Roger Bellon, the composer, who says he wasn’t just a composer, he was
      also a fan of the show, tells us that not only was the script great, but
      you were dealing with the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, which is a
      very operatic, dark and deep subject. Also the shots were big and
      filmic, and the music had to be dark and poignant and sound interesting.
      He remembers having to find an interesting “hook”, which ended up being
      a dark piano arpeggio which could underlie the Horsemen, but could also
      be interesting and provide a unique approach to the almost hell-like
      emotional aspect of the movie. For the flashback, it was supposed to
      give an impression of an ancient time and presented a different kind of
      problem. He used references to old American Indian chants, wooden pipes
      and percussive sounds that he could find on recordings of ancient tribal
      hymns.
      
      OUTAKES: They show twenty minutes worth of the jimmy scene outtakes, one
      after another. Each is slightly different, but each is incredibly
      intense. There are no words sufficient to describe the subtleties of them.
      
      THE EPISODE: Duncan and Methos emerge from a building where “Adam
      Pierson” had gone to tryout for a new game show, the “Wheel of History”.
      Duncan derides his efforts, accusing Methos of doing it out of an
      “oversized ego”. As they walk to Duncan’s car exchanging quips, they
      feel the presence of another Immortal. Methos’ reaction is to split, and
      he is disdainful of Duncan’s desire to find out “who’s around.”
      
      Amid some steam, Duncan spots a man with a scar down his face, and
      recognizes the Immortal. In a flashback to South Texas, in1867, where
      Duncan is a scout for the Texas Rangers, he tracks down a group of
      marauders led by Immortal Melvin Koren. In a classic old west
      confrontation, the Rangers and the bad guys fight, and Koren almost
      manages to behead MacLeod, but is shot by another Ranger. Koren is
      buried, and escapes.
      
      In the present, Koren slips away and Duncan continues to explore the
      area, feeling an Immortal once again. It is Cassandra, who is also
      hunting Koren, whom she calls Kronos. Cassandra is distraught in her
      obsessive zeal to find and kill Kronos. Back at the loft she tells
      Duncan about her first death at Kronos’ hands when he was one of the
      Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. She was a healer, and the Horsemen
      “were monsters,” bringing terror and death to her entire world. “Where
      they were, life ceased. They were without mercy. They were without fear.”
      
      In a flashback to the Bronze Age, we watch four masked riders descend on
      a peaceful village where Cassandra lived with her adoptive father and
      both were the village’s healers. When Cassandra’s father pleads with
      them, saying they have nothing the Horsemen want, the leader takes off
      his mask. It is Kronos. “Then you die,” he announces, and kills him, and
      the other Horsemen proceed to slaughter everyone in the village.
      
      Weeping, Cassandra tells Duncan that that day was the end of her world.
      She says she had tried to forget what had happened but when she learned
      that Kronos was alive, all the hate and pain returned. They go to Joe,
      who is initially dubious about the whole notion of four Immortals being
      the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse, but he ultimately agrees to look
      into what the Watchers know about Melvin Koren.
      
      Methos is headed to his GMC truck that evening, when he feels another
      Immortal, turns and is stabbed through the heart. “Greetings, Brother,”
      Kronos moves in as Methos gasps his name and dies. Methos revives inside
      a deserted power station, with Kronos standing over him holding a length
      of heavy chain. Kronos cheerily comments about it having been a long
      time and asks if Methos has gone soft.
      
      “I just passed through my angry adolescence a little quicker than you,
      Kronos!” Methos snarls back.
      
      Kronos tells Methos that he had thought Methos was dead until he heard
      rumors and went looking. He says he shouldn’t have been surprised, that
      Methos wasn’t the strongest or the toughest, but he was a survivor.
      “It’s what you do best.” He offers Methos a choice: Losing his head, or
      joining him.
      
      “Since you put it that way,” Methos answers grimly. “Welcome back, brother.”
      
      Methos goes to see Duncan at the dojo, and starts to tell Duncan about
      “something unexpected” coming up but Duncan interrupts, asking Methos if
      he ever heard of Kronos. Methos is taken aback and hesitates, then they
      both feel Cassandra as she enters. She takes one look at Methos and
      attacks him. (Methos: “You don’t know me!” Cassandra: “Do you think I
      could ever forget you?!”) Duncan puts himself between them.
      
      In another flashback, we are in the Horsemen’s camp. One of the Horsemen
      has taken Cassandra as a slave, and when he takes off his mask it is
      Methos. He tells her they had killed her entire village, “including
      you,” saying that she lived because he wished it and that she would stay
      alive as long as she pleased him. When she resists he hits her. “That
      did not please me.” Then he strokes her, telling her he was Methos, and
      that she should never forget that she lived to serve him. She spits at
      him as he walks away, intervening between two other Horsemen arguing
      over a robe. They are on the verge of violence when Methos threatens
      Caspian, saying if he had to “lose one, it will be you.” When Kronos
      steps up, asking if there is a problem, the men step back deferentially.
      Kronos splits the robe in two pieces, one for each man, stating flatly
      that they “share everything.” During the distraction, Cassandra tries to
      escape but Methos stops her, telling her he will kill her as many times
      as it takes to tame her.
      
      In the present, as Cassandra attacks, Methos denies it was him and calls
      upon MacLeod to “Do something!” Duncan holds onto Cassandra, yelling at
      Methos to get out of there. Cassandra is incensed that Duncan
      interfered, insisting that Methos is lying, that he was one of the
      Horsemen, killing and raping alongside Kronos.
      
      At the bar, Joe tells Duncan he’s not buying Methos and Kronos being the
      Horsemen, saying that Methos was the one Immortal he knew who never
      looked for a fight, that Cassandra had lived with her obsession for
      thousands of years, that maybe she’s delusional, or a liar, asking
      Duncan what he really knows about Cassandra. “What do I really know
      about Methos?” Duncan asks in return.
      
      “Can you imagine him murdering women and children for pleasure?” Joe asks.
      
      “No,” Duncan answers.
      
      Joe says Duncan should listen to his gut, but Duncan says that his
      instincts are not enough, and Joe says there is no proof either way.
      “Then I’m just going to have to find my own,” Duncan responds.
      
      Methos goes back to Kronos at his warehouse hideout, and Kronos
      acknowledges that Methos was smart to come back, that he knows Kronos
      would track him down, no matter how long it took, and kill him. “It’s
      nice to feel wanted,” Methos says snidely.
      
      “Not want! NEED!” Kronos tells Methos that he had tried to “take up the
      old ways” many times, but always failed because the others were “scum”,
      and he didn’t have anyone to plan his raids, anyone “who understood the
      true use of terror.” He says Methos is one of a kind, that never in
      history was there a band like theirs. As he speaks, Methos walks up
      behind him, sword drawn, but as he swings, Kronos is ready for him,
      having anticipated the move.
      
      Methos protests that he has changed, that he isn’t “like that anymore,”
      but Kronos says while he might have convinced himself he had changed,
      but inside he was still the same, that he had missed, “The Freedom! The
      Power! Riding out of the sun knowing that you’re the most terrifying
      they’d ever seen. Knowing that their weapons and their gods are useless
      against you. That you’re the last thing they’ll ever see.” As Methos
      closes his eyes against the memories and looks like he’s about to lose
      it, Kronos urges him not to fight the urges, but to feel them. Then he
      tells Methos that he will kill Cassandra for him, but in return Methos
      has to kill MacLeod.
      
      “But he’s my friend. He’s nothing to you. Why?”
      
      “Because he’s your friend. Because you still have to prove yourself and
      because YOU OWE ME!” Then he slices his palm and gives the blade to
      Methos, telling him to swear he will kill MacLeod. Methos slices his own
      palm, and they join hands, blood seeping through their fingers as Methos
      swears.
      
      Then we have the Jimmy scene, where Methos is storing things in his
      truck, evidently preparing to leave. MacLeod drives up, looking tense
      and stiff, asking what Methos was running from. Methos urges him to “let
      it be,” but Duncan asks if what Cassandra had told him was true. Methos
      tries to leave without answering, but Duncan physically stops him,
      demanding to know. Methos placatingly says that the times, the world and
      he was different. Duncan insists, “Did you kill all those people?” in a
      choked voice.
      
      Methos’ discomfort seems to resolve itself, his expression clears and he
      answers, “Yes!” Then Methos proceeds to pound the truth home again,
      saying killing was all he knew, “Is that what you want to hear?”
      
      “It’s enough,” Duncan answers, meeting his hard stare for a moment
      before turning away. But Methos grabs Duncan and slams him against the
      truck.
      
      “No, it is Not enough!” With a certain angry satisfaction, he tells
      Duncan he didn’t just kill a few, or even a lot, he killed ten thousand,
      and he was good at it.” Then he smilingly adds that it wasn’t for
      vengeance or greed, it was because he liked it, that Cassandra and her
      village were nothing to him and even laughs as he tells Duncan that he
      was Death on a horse. Duncan reverses their positions, slamming Methos
      against the truck in return as Methos smilingly relates that he was the
      monster that mothers scared their children with at night. “Is that what
      you want to hear!?” Methos demands again. “The answer is yes. Oh, yes.”
      
      Looking sucker-punched and near tears, Duncan barely manages to tell
      Methos, “We’re through.” Each man nods at the other, and Duncan turns
      and walks away.
      
      Duncan turns for one last look before he jerks off his coat and throws
      it in the car, getting in and speeding away. Methos looks after him,
      slams his coat into the truck, gets in and puts his head up against the
      steering wheel.
      
      Back at the loft, Joe tells a distraught Duncan that he’s not defending
      what Methos did, he’s just trying to understand it. Duncan is beside
      himself at the thought of Methos’ reign of death, but Joe insists they
      were “different times, different rules, different morals.” Duncan says
      he won’t compare it or excuse it, but Joe asks how much blood Duncan had
      shed in anger. Duncan says he knows what he’s done, and he has to live
      with it, but that this was different, that this was a “bunch of
      murdering bastards that burned and raped across two continents,” and
      that they butchered innocent women and children.
      
      Joe reminds Duncan that in Vietnam, he had seen innocents die in the
      crossfire.
      
      “This is different,” Duncan responds, relating with disgust that Methos
      enjoyed what he did, that he got pleasure from the killing. Then Joe
      gets a call. Cassandra’s Watcher had led them to Kronos at the old power
      station.
      
      At the power station, Kronos feels another Immortal. Assuming it is
      Methos, he calls out, “I hope you brought me his sword.” But it is
      Cassandra. Kronos is unimpressed, taunting her, telling her that Methos
      isn’t there, that he’s out “killing MacLeod.” She tries using the power
      of her Voice on him, but he is unaffected. She is no match for him as a
      fighter, and he disarms her. She slips away, but runs into Methos, who
      cold cocks her and dumps her into the river.
      
      Kronos is looking for Cassandra, but this time it is MacLeod he finds.
      It is a long, brutal battle, and as they fight, we see Methos starting
      several fires in the building. Finally, he pours a whole can of gasoline
      out and lights it. The fire spreads, finally dramatically exploding
      between the two fighters, separating them. Methos hits the fire alarm,
      and Kronos stares across the flames at MacLeod. “I can wait!” he calls.
      
      Back at the loft, a weary-looking Duncan is relieved to find Cassandra
      still alive. When she learns Duncan wasn’t able to kill Kronos, she says
      it “will never be over until they’re both dead.”
      
      “Then we’ll find them,” Duncan says resolutely, holding her.
      
      By the docks, Kronos has a sword to Methos’ neck, demanding to know why
      he stopped the fight, accusing him of saving MacLeod. “It could have
      gone either way,” Methos answers calmly. “I couldn’t take the chance.”
      
      “Are you afraid of me losing? Or him?” Kronos asks. When Methos is
      silent, Kronos suggests that he should kill Methos now to be sure he
      wasn’t wrong about him, but Methos says if does, Kronos will never have
      the Four Horsemen again, and announces that the remaining two horsemen,
      Silas and Caspian, are still alive, offering to lead Kronos to them.
      
      “Then you live,” Kronos acknowledges. “The Four Horsemen ride again,” he
      grins as “to be continued…” displays across the screen.
      
      MY COMMENTARY: In part 2.
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:28:28 -0500
      From:    kageorge <kageorge@erols.com>
      Subject: Season Five DVDs:  Comes A Horseman (pt 2/2)
      
      MY COMMENTARY: So much has been said over the years about this and the
      following episode, there is little new insight to be brought to it, I
      think. I can only express my own interpretations and opinions about what
      internal monologue may have been going on with the characters, and
      address some of the disagreements in interpretation of events or
      emotions or motivations that always seem to surface.
      
      #1: Did Methos recognize Cassandra when she first attacked him, or was
      he telling what he thought was the truth when he insisted he wasn’t the
      person she was after?
      
      My view: This one isn’t even a close call, for me. He knew her
      instantly. In the first place, he knew Caspian and Silas were alive, so
      he has obviously been tracking Immortals from the “old days” over the
      years. For him not to have similarly tracked Cassandra, who has good
      reason to wish him dead, is nonsensical. Second, he has all-too-recently
      been reminded of those events of so long ago, so they would be fresh on
      his mind. Methos is a quick thinker, the consummate survivor, and he
      instantly did the one thing that would guarantee his survival at that
      moment – he appealed to MacLeod to protect him. Yes, it was a lie, and
      in the long run it would deeply damage MacLeod’s trust in him and make
      the ultimate revelation about his past much, much more problematic, but
      rational discourse and truth-telling didn’t seem like an option at that
      particular moment.
      
      #2: Why did Methos reveal his past to MacLeod in a way virtually
      guaranteed to generate the worst possible reaction? Was he trying to
      push MacLeod away to protect him, or was it just a defensive response to
      an old, painful accusation?
      
      My view: I don’t think there is one, straightforward reason Methos
      reacted the way he did, or that Duncan reacted the way *he* did. These
      are two complex men in a complex relationship that has, as its
      foundation, the general notion that they are destined to possibly meet
      someday in combat to the death, and that their friendship is in defiance
      of that destiny. I refuse to make any broad generalizations about either
      character because that denigrates the wonderful subtleties that make
      this scene such great, great drama. I *do* think Methos is a
      manipulator, but that most of his manipulations are done on the fly,
      because they amuse him, and especially amuse him when his manipulations
      have unexpected results as they sometimes do with MacLeod. In my
      opinion, Methos gave up trying to formulate large-scale schemes when he
      walked away from the Horsemen, but he certainly still has all the
      instincts for it.
      
      As a result, when Methos physically grabs Duncan, refusing to let him
      walk away after the first confirmation that Methos was who Cassandra had
      said he was, I think it was fraught with multiple motivations. One was
      that he didn’t want to let Duncan go, that his friendship was something
      Methos truly treasured. Another was that he was angry that Duncan
      believed he understood when he didn’t understand at all. A third was the
      knowledge that he was still under an edict to kill MacLeod. If he
      succeeded in *really* pissing Duncan off, one of two things could
      happen: Duncan could challenge him, and Methos could kill him (assuming
      he could win that battle, but Methos isn’t known as an ‘honorable’
      fighter), thereby fulfilling his promise to Kronos; or, Duncan would
      hate him so much that he would walk away and never speak to him again,
      which would also get him away from Kronos. Then, of course, Methos would
      have a different problem, but he could only deal with one crisis at a time.
      
      Methos couldn’t be positive of either outcome, but you combine all those
      urges, needs and motivations, and instinct has him grabbing MacLeod and
      slamming against the truck and forcing Duncan to understand just how
      alien, how ugly, how very, very different he was so long ago, and
      watching Duncan’s face as it moves from cold anger to disgust and
      dismay, with a very strong dose of betrayal thrown in for good measure.
      Methos is both relieved and horribly grieved when Duncan says their
      friendship is over and walks away. On the one had, that Duncan *hadn’t*
      challenged him, knowing that Methos had pushed virtually every one of
      Duncan’s hot buttons, must’ve been a revelation about just how much
      Duncan had treasured their friendship, and how much Methos had just
      lost. On the other hand, now Methos had to deal with Kronos, having not
      killed MacLeod, so he had to come up with a whole new survival strategy
      – ergo, the re-grouping of the Horsemen.
      
      As for Duncan’s reactions, he is being pushed from so many different
      directions, he can hardly tell where he stands from moment to moment.
      For all that he had his own dark past, Duncan had never killed strictly
      for pleasure, and never deliberately killed innocents. His own village
      had been devastated and his father killed by marauders. And Cassandra
      was an icon from his past, a woman who had appealed to him for
      protection, further confusing his own sense of where his duties and
      responsibilities lay. So Methos reveling in his tale of killing ten
      thousand innocents just because he enjoyed the killing, and that
      Cassandra and her village were “nothing” to him, was appalling,
      especially coming from someone he considered a good and trusted friend,
      someone he could lean on, someone he could go to for advice, even if it
      was usually couched in sometimes-unpleasant cynicism and sarcasm. So he
      walked away, brimming with anger and a sense of betrayal, knowing that
      Methos had lied to him about Cassandra, wondering how many other things
      Methos had said were lies, filled with horror at Methos’ words, and with
      his gleeful attitude about all that death.
      
      #3: Duncan was unfair in judging Methos’ actions harshly, when he knew
      Darius was also had a killing past, but considered Darius practically a
      saint.
      
      My view: This assertion ends up on my ‘gimme a break’ list. Geez. You
      can argue that Darius was also a general, and that a conqueror isn’t
      doing so for the personal pleasure of killing individuals. But that
      argument is frequently met with philosophical discourse on the evils of
      war, etc., which I find tiresome – as though somehow because I don’t
      consider killing in war as evil an act as personal murder, I am de facto
      approving war, or that I don’t think that war itself is evil, which is
      absurd.
      
      But the most compelling difference between Darius and Methos is the
      simple fact that Darius never hid his past – and actually frequently
      used it as an object lesson for how *not* to live, and lived a life that
      was a polar opposite of what he had been.
      
      #4: At one point on various lists, someone who shall be nameless
      strongly argued, and there were even a few who purported to be persuaded
      (I think. I have blessedly forgotten most of that ‘conversation’) that
      Methos was the actual leader of the Horsemen and that some (unknown)
      momentous event occurred to elevate Kronos to the dominant member of
      that group. We don’t know what the momentous event was, but, according
      to the proponent of the theory, the evidence is clear and obvious that
      Methos was the original leader of the Horsemen.
      
      My view: I can’t recall all the minutiae from which this scenario was
      inferred, but it is patently absurd. All you have to do is watch that
      first scene, where the instant Kronos inquires what is going on all
      three men defer to Kronos, who unhesitatingly acts as Solomon, splitting
      the robe and declaring the rule that they all share everything.
      
      #5: Cassandra was a vengeful bitch who was utterly unreasonable and
      irrational in her single-minded pursuit of Methos.
      
      My view: Cassandra was a character with many possible interpretations,
      but I had no trouble believing that her first-death and post-death
      experiences were horrifying and would have left life-long scars,
      regardless of how long that life was. It was made clear that Methos used
      whatever methods were most painful to ensure her cooperation, and that
      he treated her as property to be used for his own benefit and pleasure.
      
      I thought her character as revealed in Prophecy was ambiguous as to
      whether she was a cold, manipulative predator or a fearful woman getting
      by as best she could. There is also ambiguity here since she pursues
      both Kronos and Methos even in the face of her own probable death. She
      can’t have hoped to win against either of them physically, so she had
      only her demonstrably unreliable Voice. Both Kronos and Methos were
      significantly older than she, had survived for thousands of years and
      were likely to be extraordinarily powerful. To rely totally on her Voice
      as her defense against them was tenuous, at best. She had to have known
      she was putting her life on the line – although she sure didn’t hesitate
      a moment to rely once again on Duncan as her defender.
      
      That she sees Methos as evil incarnate is in part a result of his own
      evil deeds, and in part a result of her guilt and disgust at her
      ultimate acquiescence and servitude to him under duress. She is blinded
      by both her history and her guilt. Was she irrational? Yes. Was it
      understandable? Completely.
      
      #6: Methos was never *really* bad, not in context of the times. Ten
      thousand wasn’t that many, after all, if you extrapolate out over a
      thousand or so years, and that’s just the way people lived way back then.
      
      My view: Hogwash. Kronos describes them as being the ultimate in evil,
      even for the times. Methos describes them as being living nightmares,
      and his use of the killing of “ten thousand” was merely metaphor for “a
      whole, whole, whole lot of people.” To minimize and trivialize what they
      were is to take away the sting of the whole episode and to paint Methos
      as simply a minor bad guy who eventually saw the error of his ways.
      Phooey on that. I want a *real* bad guy. I want a monumentally,
      seriously bad, bad guy who now lives with the reality of what he once
      was. That’s Drama!
      
      Finally, I’ve always thought Joe’s stance on Methos was utterly
      inconsistent with the Vengeful!Joe who strongly urged Duncan to kill
      John Kiernan. In that instance, it was Duncan who was gradually coming
      to grips with the fact that a former conscienceless murderer had not
      only changed, but was now trying to redeem himself. It took time, and
      some real soul-searching, but ultimately Duncan acknowledged that
      Kiernan deserved that opportunity. Joe never did.
      
      I think Joe’s initial dismissal of even the possibility that Methos
      might have a truly evil past was born of knowing him as Adam Pierson
      long before he knew him as Methos. He was unable to see that person as
      doing truly evil deeds, and perhaps has never grasped the true
      complexity inherent in living for 5,000 years. It is a very mortal
      reaction, as was Joe’s comparison of the acts of the Four Horsemen to
      his experience in Vietnam – which demonstrated that Joe was operating
      from as different a reality from Duncan as Duncan was from Methos.
      
      As for the overall quality of this episode, it was first-rate in all
      respects. Val Pelka was brilliant casting, Tracy Scoggins less so, but
      they were stuck with her after they had established her in “Prophecy”. I
      didn’t like her mostly because I felt she manipulated Duncan even more
      than Methos did, and to questionable ends for questionable motives, but
      I felt that as a character, she was interesting and effective.
      
      The flashbacks, both the one to Texas and to the Bronze Age, were
      wonderful. The “stick boy” who initially spots the Horsemen and dashes
      towards the village has achieved a small bit of notoriety, and
      Cassandra’s long talon-like nails have received criticism (although they
      tried to disguise them). Mostly, though, the atmospherics were wonderful
      – the power plant was dark, grim and threatening, full of sharp edges
      and mysterious machines, and the music matched the emotional context
      really well, adding to the power of the scenes.
      
      All the characters were fabulously complex, their motives unclear and
      their actions fraught with unforeseen consequences – just like life. <g>
      
      Of course, there is much more to come in the finale to this brilliant
      two-part epic.
      
      MacGeorge
      All episode commentaries can be found at:
      http://www.wordsmiths.net/MacGeorge/episodes/indexframeset.htm
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 1 Nov 2004 18:46:30 -0500
      From:    Heidi <heidi@bronze.lcs.mit.edu>
      Subject: Re: 'Best Of' Really?
      
        From: Prodipto Roy <proy@microsoft.com>
        [..] got the Best of Highlander DVD set. These are the episodes they used:
        The Gathering - First Episode. Passing of the torch from Connor to Duncan.
      
      Do people really think of `The Gathering' as one of the `Best'? While
      it introduced Duncan, his story, and had Connor as a guest character,
      Slan was so bad that it did alot to offset the good parts of the episode.
      The character seemed more like something from a comic book or cartoon
      and he was so over-acted that he just seemed silly and changed the `tone'
      of the episode. It's a shame that what could have been a really good
      episode had that for the `evil-Immortal-of-the-week'. Or do some of you
      actually like the character and thought it fit in?  (while they had it
      as one of the 14 `best', I wouldn't be suprised if a fair number would
      count it as one of the worst if a list of those was done.)
      
        Duende - IMO the weakest of the episodes on the Best of Series
      
      That seems to get alot of mixed opinions. It seems to mostly depend on
      how interested in the sword aspects of the series the person in question is.
      
      =}{=
      
      
      (heidi@bronze.lcs.mit.edu)
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 1 Nov 2004 19:25:49 EST
      From:    Highlandmg@aol.com
      Subject: Re: 'Best Of' Really?
      
      well The Gathering will always be on my top ten and is one I will always  get
      to rewatch. I have to say it was my favote for a long time and somethimes it
      still is. I love how Duncan facical expressions in the kitch with Tessa and
      Connor. I love Tessa is this as well as well as Richie being a teenager.
      
      Mary will always love the gathering
      
      ------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:26:06 -1000
      From:    MacWestie <mac.westie@verizon.net>
      Subject: Re: 'Best Of' Really?
      
      > Do people really think of `The Gathering' as one of the `Best'? While
      > it introduced Duncan, his story, and had Connor as a guest character,
      > Slan was so bad that it did alot to offset the good parts of the episode.
      
      The Gathering has a special place in my heart (well, it _would_ if I had a
      heart).  It was the first ep & started something amazing.  Parts of it
      clearly showed the potential of both the concept & the ensemble.  And, in an
      entertainment rarity, the potential was reached (& even exceeded in a few
      season 5 eps).  Yes, Slan was a buffoon, the plot was shaky, & AP's take on
      Duncan there was frequently wooden.  Doesn't matter--the ep is still
      something special.  Same w/ the Farscape pilot ep--at times brilliant, yet
      laughable in some areas--but still, it was the riveting beginning of
      something great.
      
      I think any polling TPTB did for the "Best of" collection was largely a
      formality.  Certain eps were sure to be included just because they afforded
      so much room for comment & exploration in the various extras the set
      offered.  Duende, for instance, had an odd genesis & included both AP's
      flamenco dancing & the unique sword style--lots to talk about & demonstrate
      there in the extras.  Studies in Light, on the other hand--a nice show but
      not offering much to explore in the extras for this set.  The eps used
      weren't so much the best (in the sense of favorites) of the series as they
      were landmark episodes--& surely the pilot ep is a must-have in that
      category.
      
      Nina
      mac.westie@verizon.net
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 30 Oct 2004 to 1 Nov 2004 (#2004-200)
      **************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 1 Nov 2004 to 5 Nov 2004 (#2004-201)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 29 Oct 2004 to 30 Oct 2004 (#2004-199)"