There are 5 messages totalling 180 lines in this issue. Topics of the day: 1. Too damn quiet here (2) 2. stuff on e-bay (3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:14:07 -0400 From: virginia <vfoster_042@bellsouth.net> Subject: Re: Too damn quiet here >Wendy-- >>How about "Highlander: The Source" ? >... >>See it unfold. Nina added: >You can pretty much do just that by following the ebay auctions >of props & wardrobe supposedly from The Source. They seem to be >selling it off piece by piece. Surely the crap, um, memorabilia >would bring more _after_ the flick opens when fans would have a >frame of reference for, say, the boot Duncan wore as he held a dying >___ or the machete Methos used to whack ______. Unless the film >totally sucks, of course. But, what are the odds of that.... What really makes me laugh is this first line from the auction item descriptions. "Scheduled for release Fall, 2006 to Lionsgate, the fifth Highlander Movie, The Source is now scheduled for 1st quarter 2007 release." Fall 2006? Now first quarter 2007? Do I hear mid-2007? Late 2007? Just how far can they push this out. :-) virginia ----------------------------------------------------------------------- vfoster_042@bellsouth.net ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Yeah right! If I want to torture the audience on purpose!" Martin Lloyd, Stargate SG-1 '200' (after the S/J "wedding") ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 22:27:16 -0400 From: Wendy <Immortals_Incorporated@cox.net> Subject: Re: Too damn quiet here > Wendy-- > > How about "Highlander: The Source" ? > ... > > See it unfold. Nina: > You can pretty much do just that by following the ebay > auctions of props & wardrobe supposedly from The Source. Sure. But it's more fun to make it up as I go along with little regard for the actual plot. > They seem to be selling it off piece by piece. Surely the crap, > um, memorabilia would bring more _after_ the flick opens No. I think not. Before the movie opens, that big blue suit that the ancient cursed Immortal wears seems cool. Once you've seen the movie and discover that he looks just like the demon, Balthazar, in BtVS episode "Bad Girls" it's not so cool and not worth squat. >when fans would have a frame of reference for, > say, the boot Duncan wore as he held a dying ___ Boot? Singular? Ouch. Poor Duncan. Now he knows how Xavier felt <eg> >or the machete Methos used to whack > ______. More likely the ratty fur-collared coat Methos wore after sleeping with _____ > Unless the film totally sucks, of course. But, what > are the odds of that.... Why would it suck? Because it was directed by the man who brought us "Lawnmower Man" or because it is being edited by an insurance company or because there are no flashbacks or because Duncan ______ and Joe ____ and Methos ______? > (who can just hear the so-called thinking here) ("Bill's low on Scotch--sell ALL the katanas!") Maybe Duncan doesn't use a katana in this movie- that's so yesterday. In the near-post-apocalyptic-future, surely he'll have a vibro-blade? Wendy(For only $95.45 you can own the authentic plain white polyester shirt worn by the third extra from the right in the crowd scene where everyone in Bulgaria looks up for 3 seconds when an Immortal flies over.) Immortals Inc. immortals_incorporated@cox.net "Weasels for Eternity" ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:52:23 +0200 From: Tarryn Zank <zankt@ukzn.ac.za> Subject: stuff on e-bay Saw the recent posts about the stuff on e-bay, so I went to have a look. Now, do they seriously think anyone is going to pay $319 for a jacket belonging to a nobody-actress? And I certainly hope the one idiot who *has* bid on an item realises that he/she is bidding on the *drawing* of a ring, not the ring itself. (no offence if it's someone on this list, but c'mon, get real, $25 for a drawing?) The mind boggles. Some people out there obviously have way too much money and no idea how to spend it. TarrynZ Please find our Email Disclaimer here: http://www.ukzn.ac.za/disclaimer/ ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 06:04:07 -0400 From: degruy@aol.com Subject: Re: stuff on e-bay <<Now, do they seriously think anyone is going to pay $319 for a jacket belonging to a nobody-actress? And I certainly hope the one idiot who *has* bid on an item realises that he/she is bidding on the *drawing* of a ring, not the ring itself. (no offence if it's someone on this list, but c'mon, get real, $25 for a drawing?) The mind boggles. Some people out there obviously have way too much money and no idea how to spend it.>> That just takes me back to the charity auctions there used to be during the conventions. I remember one year the napkin that AP was using onstage went for 50 bucks or so. Or was it way more. I just nodded my head and told myself it was all for charity. Course I doubt this EBay auction is. Edward deGruy. ________________________________________________________________________ Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:45:47 -1000 From: Nina Davis <macwestie@hawaii.rr.com> Subject: Re: stuff on e-bay TarrynZ > The mind boggles. Some people out there obviously have way too much > money and no idea how to spend it. Which also applies to those who funded this flick. The franchise has sunk so low the old adage of "throwing good money after bad" doesn't even cover it. Nina (major earthquakes in Hawaii) (who knew?) (and, that standing in a doorway thing is just lame) macwestie@hawaii.rr.com ------------------------------ End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 24 Oct 2006 to 25 Oct 2006 (#2006-5) *************************************************************