HIGHLA-L Digest - 17 Nov 2001 to 19 Nov 2001 (#2001-304)

      Automatic digest processor (LISTSERV@LISTS.PSU.EDU)
      Mon, 19 Nov 2001 22:00:01 -0500

      • Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 19 Nov 2001 to 20 Nov 2001 (#2001-305)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 15 Nov 2001 to 17 Nov 2001 (#2001-303)"

      --------
      There is one message totalling 22 lines in this issue.
      
      Topics of the day:
      
        1. The old "Are Immortals born" debate
      
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      Date:    Mon, 19 Nov 2001 15:02:00 -0500
      From:    "l.lowe" <l.lowe@morehead-st.edu>
      Subject: Re: The old "Are Immortals born" debate
      
      Maybe the act of abandonment by the real parents is traumatic enough to
      trigger the predisposition to immortality in more sensitive babies?
      
      Linda L.
      ***********************
      
      Stephen Bryce wrote:
      > That's a good question, but I think the one that must
      > first be solved is this: if Immortals are born just
      > like any other human, then why have all of them been
      > left alone as babies, to be picked up by whoever
      > happens to pass by?
      
      ------------------------------
      
      End of HIGHLA-L Digest - 17 Nov 2001 to 19 Nov 2001 (#2001-304)
      ***************************************************************
      
      --------

      • Next message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 19 Nov 2001 to 20 Nov 2001 (#2001-305)"
      • Previous message: Automatic digest processor: "HIGHLA-L Digest - 15 Nov 2001 to 17 Nov 2001 (#2001-303)"